Arizona District Court Upholds “Lou Anne's Law”
Arizona women afforded some protection from seedy abortionists

 More on Biskind's Trial for Lou Anne's Death
• Judge Further Hinders Biskind Prosecution
• High Court Blocks Info From Biskind Jury
• Biskind Trial Update
• Abortionist John Biskind
• Lisa Bardsley, Abortion Death
 More Arizona Death and Malpractice
• Inglewood Abortionist P. Scott Ricke
• Parental Involvement Legislation Updates
• Tamis Hospitalizes Abortion Patient
• A-Z's Previous Abortionist's Lawsuit
• Lisa Bardsley, Abortion Death
• DaNette Pergusson, Abortion Death
• Abortionist Moshe Hachamovitch
  Related Resources
• Safe-n-Legal or Back Alley Butchery?
• Back Alley Butchers vs Main Street Maimers
• Unintended Late Abortions
• Late Abortion Lies: They're Only Done for Health Reasons
• What Passes for Professionalism at Abortion Clinics?
 Elsewhere on the Web
• Rules Set in Biskind Trial
• Too late for abortion, witness says
• High court blocks evidence against abortion doctor
• Arizona Abortionist Arrested in Legal Abortion Death
• Procedure began as abortion, ended as birth
• Abortion Practitioner Had Bad History Before Abortion Death
• Valley case fuels debate over late-term procedure, doctor competence
• ABC 20/20 Exposes Dangerous Abortion Clinics
• Report Details Medical Irresponsibility in Arizona Woman's Abortion-Related Death
• Biskind lives, works in two different worlds (near-abortion update)
• Biskind Charged With Manslaughter
• Beyond Offensive
• News of woman's botched abortion death now surfacing
• Arizona Abortionist Nearly Kills Baby in 37th Week
• Jury told medical instrument ruptured abortion patient's uterus
• Biskind trial full of grim details
• Defense witness: abortion doc had no reason to suspect fatal bleed
• Abortion doctor is calm on stand
• Jurors Deliberating in Abortion Trial
• Lou Anne Herron and the modern-day backstreet butcher
• Arizona Supreme Court Blocks Key Evidence in Botched Abortion Case
• Arizona abortionist sent to prison for manslaughter
• Medical Malpractice in the Wake of Abortion-Related Deaths
• No choice for pro-life martyr
• She Didn't Have to Die
• Arizona Abortion Doctor Suspended
• Abortion: Legal, yes. Safe? I think not.
• Arizona: Summary of Medical Malpractice Law
 

Dateline: 10/2/02

From Americans United for Life

On September 30, the U.S. District Court in Tucson upheld in substantial part Arizona’s comprehensive abortion clinic regulations known as “Lou Anne’s Law,” rejecting the vast majority of the constitutional challenges brought by three Arizona abortion providers.

“This is a tremendous victory for the women of Arizona,” said Denise Burke, staff counsel with Americans United for Life (AUL). Burke, along with Nikolas T. Nikas, AUL’s general counsel, has been appointed a Special Assistant Maricopa County Attorney to defend “Lou Anne’s Law.”

“Women in Arizona and elsewhere have been the victims of the abortion industry's refusal to police itself. In opposing these common-sense regulations, the abortion industry reveals an ugly agenda—pocketing profits instead of investing in women's safety. How many more women need to die or be permanently injured from unsafe abortions? Until now, a veterinary clinic had more safety regulations.”

“Lou Anne’s Law” was passed in direct response to the tragic 1998 death in a Phoenix abortion clinic of Lou Anne Herron. She bled to death after her uterus was punctured by an abortion provider, who later left the clinic while she was bleeding heavily in the recovery room and in need of immediate emergency care. The abortion provider, John Biskind, was later convicted of manslaughter and is currently serving a five-year prison sentence.

“If Arizona’s clinic regulations had been in place in 1998, Lou Anne Herron would not have died,” said Burke. “Regulations such as these are necessary to ensure that minimal health and safety standards are met.”

Arizona’s comprehensive abortion clinic regulations cover such matters as staff qualifications, procedures to provide emergency care, sanitation, infection control, quality assurance, and maintenance of patient records. State Department of Health Services officials are authorized to inspect facilities for compliance, and violations of the regulatory requirements could result in criminal and civil liability.

Following oral arguments on April 8, 2002, District Court Judge Raner C. Collins determined that Arizona’s abortion clinic regulations did not “unduly burden” a woman’s right to choose abortion, did not violate constitutional equal protection guarantees, and did not unlawfully delegate state authority to third parties. Judge Collins also determined that, save for one provision, the law was not unconstitutionally vague.

While upholding the vast majority of the regulations, Judge Collins found that provisions providing state officials with unannounced access to abortion clinics during business hours and allowing state officials to review unredacted patient records and ultrasound prints were unconstitutional. The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, in conjunction with the Arizona Attorney General’s Office, is considering an appeal of these specific rulings.

The case is Tucson Women’s Clinic v. Eden, District Court for the District of Arizona, No. 00-141-TUC RCC.

Americans United for Life, the legal arm of the pro-life movement, is a nonprofit, public-interest law firm and educational organization. The oldest national pro-life organization in America, AUL has been committed to defending human life through vigorous judicial, legislative, and educational efforts since 1971.

News Archives

How helpful was this site? Take the Pro Life Views Visitor Satisfaction Poll.