web space | free website | Business Hosting Services | Free Website Submission | shopping cart | php hosting
Ruth Hall, Back Alley Abortion Death
One of a string of Oklahoma City deaths
 Explore this Site
  Other Resources
• Abortion Statistics
• Abortion Laws
• Activism Links
• Analytical Tools
• Dirty Prochoice Laundry
• Dirty Proabortion Tricks
• Graphic Stuff
• Legal Abortion Advantages
• Pro-Abortion Lies
 More on illegal and amateur abortion
• 1955 Planned Parenthood Abortion Conference: Background
• 19th Century Abortion Cases and Other Self-Injury
• Abortion Practice Before Legalization
• Abortion: Public Health Miracle?
• Back Alley Butchers vs Main Street Maimers
• The Bad Old Days of Abortion
• The Changing Face of Abortion
• Coathanger Abortion: Powerful image, but how true to life?
• Criminal Abortion Deaths Uncovered
• Doctors and the Back-Alley Abortion
• A Glimpse Into Abortion's Past
• Illegal Abortions by Amateurs
• Illegal Abortions by Paramedical People
• Illegal Abortions by Physicians
• Post-Roe Illegal Abortions
• Safe-n-Legal or Back-Alley Butchery?
• Self-Induced Abortion Deaths
• The Truth of Pre-Roe Abortion Mortality
• What California Found
• What Minnesota Found
• What if Roe Goes?
 Food for Thought
• Botched Abortion Leads to Amputation
• LDI and the CDC
• Misplaced Priorities Cost Women's Lives
• Unequal Burden on the Poor?
• The Bad Old Days of Abortion
• Who's Putting the Unborn Ahead of the Born?
• A Mother's Nightmare
• Do Rape Victims Really Need Abortions?
• What's the Need for Abortion?
• Your Bedroom, the Government, and Abortion Laws
• Is Childbirth Safety Relevant to Abortion?
• When the POC Really is Just Tissue
• Is 'Who Decides?' Really the Question?
• Stress and the Abortion Decision
• Coathanger Abortion: Powerful image, but how true to life?
• Unplanned Pregnancies that Worked Out
• Fetal Diagnoses Leading to Unnecessary Abortions
• Who is the Enemy?
• Did I Deserve the Death Penaltyh
• Is This the Face of the Enemy?
• Another Anti-Choice Fanatic
• Question Abortion
• Abortion, Law, and Real Choice
• Women's Rights are Common Ground
• The Abortion War and Communication
• What Real Informed Consent Would Look Like
• Diane Sawyer and the Non-Story of Lawson Akpulonu
• Women Who Change Their Minds After the Abortion
• Comparative Safety - Abortion & Stuff Folks Get Riled About
• Where's the Pro Choice Movement on Elective Amputations?
• Unintended Late Abortions
• 19th Century Abortion Cases and Other Self-Injury
• Are Abortions Used as Birth Control?
• Pro Child/Pro Choice Rings Hollow
• The "Koop Report" on Abortion
• What's "Adequate Access" to Abortion?
• Abortion, Suffering, and the Chinese Widow
• Freaks Teaches Pro-Life Lesson


Dr. Richard E. Thacker maintained an office and operating rooms in the Terminal Building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. In the early part of April, 1932, Ruth Hall, who was unmarried, went with her friends, Helen Wright and Margy Brown, to Thacker's practice. Ruth was in good health at the time, but had discovered that she was pregnant. Helen reported that Ruth was on vacation from her job at Southwest Bell Telephone Company. Ruth's friends stayed in the waiting room while Thacker took Ruth back into his exam room for five or ten minutes. Thacker told Ruth to return at noon the following day, April 6, a Wednesday.

Ruth had borrowed money to pay for the abortion. She, Margy, and Helen returned as instructed, bringing Ruth's roommate, Elma Benne, with them. The four young women awated Thacker's arrival in his waiting room. After he arrived, Helen went into the procedure room with Ruth, while Elma and Margy waited.

Helen said she saw Ruth give Thacker money, but she didn't know how much. Ruth then got onto the table as instructed by Tyacker.

Here is Helen's testimony regarding what happened next:

She was on her back with her knees up; defendant used a long slender instrument, and then packed her with gauze; I guess he packed her womb; I saw him insert the instrument into her private parts; he did not make any examination before he used this instrument, nor did he take her temperature; he did not test her heart or feel her pulse. If he asked anything about her condition I did not hear it; we were in a small narrow room; she asked him when to remove the gauze, and he said 24 hours.

Helen testified that there were some other women in Thacker's office when she and Ruth collected their friends and went back to the bording house where Ruth lived. Helen remained with her friend for four hours, leaving her in the care of her roommate.

Helen returned to the boarding house on Thursday, and spent the night with Ruth and Elma. Ruth took ill in the night. Elma said that her friend "suffered quite a bit", and got up to use the bathroom, where Ruth passed something. Elma thought that Ruth seemd to feel a bit better after that. Both Helen and Elma observed blood on the bed at the time. Elma described it as "a spot the size of two hands".

Helen said goodbye to Ruth at 10:00 Friday morning. She never saw her friend again.

On Saturday, Ruth's brother came to bring his sister to their parents' house, as was their routine. Mrs. Hall reported that Ruth was sick when she arrived at about 4 or 5 p.m. It wasn't until roughly 11:00 that Ruth finally told her mother why she was ill. Mrs. Hall called Dr. Vaughn, their family doctor. He didn't provide any care for Ruth, but did consult with her mother over the phone.

Mrs. Hall then called Thacker. Here is her testimony regarding that phone call:

When I phoned defendant, I stated: 'This is Mrs. George Hall, at Bethany. Do you remember a girl coming to your office by the name of Ruth Hall?' He said he did not remember her, that she was not there. 'Well' I said, 'She is sick and we want you to come out and see her.' He said, 'What is the trouble,' and I said, 'You know what is the matter with her, come out right away.' He said, 'I haven't got any way to get out there.' I told him I could tell him a way. He said he would have to get a taxi. I did not care how he got there, all I wanted was for him to come. He acted like he was not going to come, and I said, 'You will wish you had. You had better come on out here if you know what is good for you.'

Defendant came out; my daughter was in a back bedroom, and I went with him to her room; I don't think he asked any questions about her physical condition; he asked what was the matter; she smiled at him and did not say anything; he had taken her temperature and she did not have any fever at all.

He opened up his case to get his instruments and started in like he was going to work on her without sterilizing his instruments or washing his hands; I asked him if he was not going to sterilize his instruments or wash his hands; he said, 'I guess I had better;' he washed his hands, but did not sterilize his instruments; he took out an instrument of some kind, and used that on her; he used that to dilate her vagina, then used a swab with cotton and stuck that in a bottle that contained iodine and swabbed her out with it; after he treated her he sat at the foot of the bed and talked with us for some time. He said, 'This is something I certainly do not approve of; I told the girl this when she came to the office and wanted help, but I could not turn her down. It seems like the more I try to help people lately the most of them get into worse trouble;' he said if his wife knew this 'she would kill me. I feel like sometimes going and jumping in the river, and if I had I would be better off.' He further said, 'Before I do anything like this again, the husbands will have to come with the wives, or the mothers with the daughters.'

I asked him about getting another doctor, and he said he did not think it necessary. She died Friday evening. I called Dr. Vaughn, and he would not come. I called Dr. Ferris and defendant; Dr. Ferris got there first, then the defendant came. She was dead when defendant got there.

After Ruth's death, Thacker said, Ruth's sister tied to shake him down for funeral expenses. Thacker refused, on the grounds that he felt he had done everything he could for Ruth. Her sister threatened to turn him in to the police. Thacker fled to his brother-in-law's ranch near Amarillo, Texas, where he changed his name to Miller. He then relocated to Springdale, Arkansas, where he was finally appreheded. He was arrested in the afternoon, and claimed at the time of his arrest that he had been planning to return to Oklahoma City that evening.

Over Thacker's understandable, albeit unsustainable, objections, the court permitted a number of witnesses to testify that after Ruth's visit to his practice, Thacker had performed fatal abortions on Robbie Lou Thompson, Lennis May Roach, and Nancy Joe Seay Lee. The witnesses went into detail about the events, up to and including the death of each of them.

Thacker testified that Ruth had indeed come to his office, but he denied performing an abortion on her. He said that she was seeking aftercare for an abortion she had obtained elsewhere from another doctor. He did admit that he had been summoned to the Hall home by Ruth's mother, but he denied any of the statements he made to Mrs. Hall regarding having an abortion practice. He also admitted to having trated Robbie Lou Thompson, Lennis May Roach, and Nancy Joe Lee, but denied that he performed any abortions.

Thacker was conviced of murder, but appealed the conviction, claiming seventeen errors in the prosecution of his case, mostly focusing on the presentation of evidence that he had performed abortions on other women. Thacker's attorneys held that this evidence was prjudicial. But the state countered that the evidence of numerous other abortions demonstrated that Thacker was a practicing abortionist and that the crime against Ruth was performed as a part of that business.

The appeal also challenged other aspects of the state's case, and boiled down to, "You didn't prove she was pregnant. And even if she was, you didn't prove that I used any instruments on her. And even if I did, you didn't prove that I used them to cause an abortion. And even if I did, you didn't prove that the abortion wasn't necessary to save her life. Not to mention you didn't prove that the abortion caused her death." The state noted that circumstantial evidence was sufficient. Thacker's appeal clearly illustrates why so many doctors who clearly were performing abortions were nevertheless not convicted, since one weak link in the chain of proof could destroy the state's entire case.

New York Times; "Abortion Ring", Time, Monday, May 9, 1932; Thacker v State. 1933 OK CR 119. 26 P.2d 770. 55 Okl.Cr. 161. Decided: 10/27/1933. Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

Illegal by Doctors Illegal by Paramedical Illegal by Amateurs Self Induced

Keep in mind that things that things we take for granted, like antibiotics and blood banks, were still in the future. For more about abortion in this era, see Abortion in the 1930s.

For more on pre-legalization abortion, see The Bad Old Days of Abortion

Previous articles

Search this site powered by FreeFind

View the Cemetery of Choice Calendar
Free Calendar from Bravenet.com Free Calendar from Bravenet.com

Send me your feedback!


Cemetery of Choice

Not Just the Unborn