High Court Blocks Info From Biskind Jury
Information on Biskind's prior misdeeds might "confuse" jurors in abortion death trial
 Join the Discussion
"Are the courts treating the jury as if they're as stupid an incompetent as courts have declared abortion patients to be?"
Christina
 
ZZZPOLLBEGIN161825947POLLENDZZZ
  Related Resources
• Women Killed by Abortion
• Abortion Malpractice
• Behind Closed Doors
• Abortionist John Biskind
• Lisa Bardsley, Abortion Death
• Arizone Pro Life Information
 
 Elsewhere on the Web
• High court blocks evidence against abortion doctor
• Arizona Abortionist Arrested in Legal Abortion Death
• Procedure began as abortion, ended as birth
• Abortion Practitioner Had Bad History Before Abortion Death
• Valley case fuels debate over late-term procedure, doctor competence
• ABC 20/20 Exposes Dangerous Abortion Clinics
/latetermfuror.html">Valley case fuels debate over late-term procedure, doctor competence
• Report Details Medical Irresponsibility in Arizona Woman's Abortion-Related Death
• Biskind lives, works in two different worlds (near-abortion update)
• Biskind Charged With Manslaughter
• Beyond Offensive
• News of woman's botched abortion death now surfacing
• Arizona Abortionist Nearly Kills Baby in 37th Week
 

Dateline: 1/15/01

The Arizona Supreme Court has decided that the jury will be barred from learning three crucial pieces of evidence against abortionist John Biskind. Biskind is on trial for manslaughter in the death Lou Ann Herron, of an abortion patient who bled to death under his care in 1998.

The Court simply barred prosecutors from informing the jury about previous disciplinary actions the Board of Medical Examiners had taken against Biskind. The Court issued no comment on the decision, simply letting stand Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Michael Wildinson's conclusion that the information would confuse the jury and prejudice them against Biskind. But then, any evidence that Biskind knew his acts might endanger the patient would tend to prejudice a jury against him.

According to the Arizona Star, the excluded pieces of evidence are:

Gerald Grant, Deputy County Attorney for Maricopa County, believes Biskind intends to argue that his acts leading to the death were "merely negligent, not criminally negligent or reckless." Grant argued that the information about the previous run-ins with the medical board were necessary to demonstrate that Biskind was aware of a "substantial and unjustifiable risk that his conduct would cause the death of another, and consciously disregarded that risk."

Grant said that although Lou Ann was bleeding heavily, Biskind left the clinic and another employee, Carol Stuart-Schadoff, would not let an assistant summon an ambulance for the moribund patient.

Biskind's previous run-ins with the medical board involved trying to abort a near-term infant and allowing another patient, Lisa Bardsley, to die.

News Archives

How helpful was this site? Take the Pro Life Views Visitor Satisfaction Poll.

ZZZCHATSTAT1ZZZ

ZZZNEWSLETTERSIGNUP1ZZZ